Federal Court Rejects Binance.US Fund Freeze Request

Changpeng Zhao Binance SEC

Recently, the Federal Court in Washington, DC, has rejected the request of the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to freeze the funds of Binance.US, the US branch of the popular cryptocurrency exchange.

The judge in charge of the case, Amy Berman Jackson, has ruled that she sees no need to take this drastic measure at this time, and instead hopes that both parties can reach an agreement through mediation.

This decision allows Binance.US to continue operating in the country while the investigations are carried out. In addition, during the process there has been a debate about the classification of certain cryptocurrencies as securities, which has generated uncertainty about the current legislation.

Judge dismisses the freezing of Binance.US funds.

Judge Amy Berman Jackson has decided not to freeze the funds of Binance.US, arguing that she does not see the need for this measure at the current time. Her decision is based on the belief that both parties involved can work together and agree on the limits and conditions that should apply.

The judge has asked Binance.US to provide a balance sheet of its trading assets and expenses to the court, and has urged both the exchange and the regulator to enter into negotiations to establish fair terms. More details on this resolution are expected to be provided at a later date.

Discussion on cryptocurrencies classified as securities.

During the legal process, the classification of certain cryptocurrencies as securities has been intensely debated. Judge Jackson has stated that it is not clear whether these cryptocurrencies should be considered securities or commodities, raising questions about how they should be classified under current law.

Binance’s lawyers have argued that the SEC has failed to conclusively prove that the flagged assets are securities, and have rejected the regulator’s freeze request. The discussion has led to questions about whether the definition of values ​​is applicable to cryptocurrencies in their current form.

Importance of mediation and the lack of clear definitions.

The Federal Court decision not to freeze Binance.US assets highlights the importance of mediation between the parties involved. Judge Jackson has emphasized that collaboration and dialogue are essential to resolve the case fairly and without compromising the operations of the exchange.

In addition, this case highlights the lack of clear definitions for cryptocurrencies in current legislation, which has generated misunderstandings and arbitrariness in the regulatory field. Critics and analysts point out the need to establish more precise and updated definitions to avoid confusion and promote a clearer and more favorable regulatory environment for the cryptocurrency industry.

To end.

The rejection of the application to freeze the funds of Binance.US by the Federal Court in Washington, DC, represents a step forward for the exchange and sends a message to the cryptocurrency industry in general. Judge Amy Berman Jackson expressed her dissatisfaction with the lack of solid evidence presented by the SEC and emphasized the importance of cooperation and mediation between the two parties.